Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 47: 101411, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35518118

RESUMEN

Background: The WHO in collaboration with the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, established a nationwide electronic data platform across referral-level hospitals. We report the burden of maternal, foetal and neonatal complications and quality and outcomes of care during the first year. Methods: Data were analysed from 76,563 women who were admitted for delivery or on account of complications within 42 days of delivery or termination of pregnancy from September 2019 to August 2020 across the 54 hospitals included in the Maternal and Perinatal Database for Quality, Equity and Dignity programme. Findings: Participating hospitals reported 69,055 live births, 4,498 stillbirths and 1,090 early neonatal deaths. 44,614 women (58·3%) had at least one pregnancy complication, out of which 6,618 women (8·6%) met our criteria for potentially life-threatening complications, and 940 women (1·2%) died. Leading causes of maternal death were eclampsia (n = 187,20·6%), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (n = 103,11·4%), and sepsis (n = 99,10·8%). Antepartum hypoxia (n = 1455,31·1%) and acute intrapartum events (n = 913,19·6%) were the leading causes of perinatal death. Predictors of maternal and perinatal death were similar: low maternal education, lack of antenatal care, referral from other facility, previous caesarean section, latent-phase labour admission, operative vaginal birth, non-use of a labour monitoring tool, no labour companion, and non-use of uterotonic for PPH prevention. Interpretation: This nationwide programme for routine data aggregation shows that maternal and perinatal mortality reduction strategies in Nigeria require a multisectoral approach. Several lives could be saved in the short term by addressing key predictors of death, including gaps in the coverage of internationally recommended interventions such as companionship in labour and use of labour monitoring tool. Funding: This work was funded by MSD for Mothers; and UNDP/UNFPA/ UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a co-sponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO).

2.
Niger Postgrad Med J ; 23(3): 146-51, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623727

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim and objective of the study was to determine the incidence, bacterial isolates and the antibiogram sensitivity of the isolates in neonates with septicaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The neonates with clinical diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia (NNS) were consecutively enrolled into our special care baby unit. The patients were investigated including blood cultures, cerebrospinal fluid cultures and urine among others. Data were analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: Forty-six neonates (42.0%) had a positive blood culture, while 64 (58.0%) were blood culture-negative. Eighteen (39.1%) of those septicaemic neonates with positive blood culture were inborn, while 28 (60.9%) were outborn. The incidence of NNS was 5.9/1000 live births. The male-to-female ratio among septicaemic neonates was 1.9:1. The common risk factors for NNS were prolonged rupture of membrane, prematurity and low socioeconomic status of parents among others. Common clinical features were fever, poor feeding, excessive crying, tachypnoea and hepatomegaly. Staphylococcus aureus 16 (69.6%) and Streptococcus pyogenes 5 (21.8%) were the predominant Gram-positive organisms isolated whereas Escherichia coli 9 (39.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae 7 (30.4%) were the predominant Gram-negative organisms isolated. S. aureus was sensitive to cephalosporins and quinolones, but resistant to penicillins. E. coli and K. pneumoniae showed a high resistance (16.7% and 25.6%, respectively) to commonly used aminoglycoside such as gentamycin. CONCLUSION: The burden of NNS was high with high mortality in the study centre. The sensitivity pattern had remarkably changed; however, a combination of cephalosporins such as cefuroxime and gentamycin is still a good option.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/microbiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Nigeria , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...